| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • Dokkio Sidebar (from the makers of PBworks) is a Chrome extension that eliminates the need for endless browser tabs. You can search all your online stuff without any extra effort. And Sidebar was #1 on Product Hunt! Check out what people are saying by clicking here.

View
 

Orphan Works, Fair-Use, and Risk Management

Page history last edited by Laura Clark Brown 13 years, 7 months ago

Moderator:   Merrilee Proffitt

Panelists:      Heather Briston, Sharon E. Farb, Peter Hirtle, Bill Maher, and Mary Minow

  

Questions: 

o       Can an argument be made that the digitization of an entire manuscript collection is a transformative work, and how effective is the argument?

o       Do large-scale digitization of manuscript collections and the online presentation of the digital facsimiles constitute publication?

o       Assuming that copyright permissions cannot be secured for every item, what are the legal ramifications of being considered a publication?

o       Has publication on microfilm of many SHC collections changed copyright status of those collections, extending the protection until 2047 or longer, or altered the available remedies for infringement?

o       Does the digitization and free online access to a document embedded in a manuscript collection affect the market value for the copyright holder of that document?

o       In terms of constructing a fair use argument for digitizing an entire collection, how much consideration must we give to the market value of intellectual property when a document was created by a notable living person or by an author with a literary estate?

o       What are the crucial elements of a risk assessment that should be conducted prior to the large-scale digitization and freely available online presentation of manuscript collections containing orphan works?

o       How risky is it to digitize and to present freely online a manuscript collection containing published and still copyright protected materials—e.g., newspaper clippings, pamphlets, brochures, etc.?

o       What constitutes due diligence for identifying copyright holders in a manuscript collection prior to digitization and online presentation?

o       How does the size of the collection and the number of both orphan works and potentially copyright protected items affect the obligations of due diligence?

o       If we change our business model and charge access fees, do our legal risks and obligations change?

o       Are we placing ourselves or our donors at risk for defamation claims if we make contemporary manuscript collections available in the online environment?

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.